autoblog: evo x vs sti
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,662
From: Sebastopol, CA
Car Info: '04 PSM Sti
Last edited by crfsti; Apr 24, 2011 at 02:46 PM.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 649
From: San Mateo, CA
Car Info: 2005 WRX, tuned by Ed@EQ
someone on the autoblog post had a good point though. it's not fair to judge the times year to year due to air pressure of tires, air temp, weather, etc. a decent point considering the times each year are soo close.
here's my issue with comparos like these: the driver might be the variable.
unlike the STIG, 2 diff drivers drive the 2 diff cars.
i suggest they hire the STIG to do the timed tests...
unlike the STIG, 2 diff drivers drive the 2 diff cars.
i suggest they hire the STIG to do the timed tests...
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 17,962
From: in a glass case of emotion.
Car Info: 345/30/19s
a bit of a hollow victory though...
"Neither car is quite as quick as its immediate ancestor though. "
How the hell do you **** that up? Who in the hell would buy a car, either of these, thats slower AND more expensive than the one its replacing?? Its not like these cars got saddled with crippling emissions or crash standards since last year? They have EVERY reason FASTER than their predecessors?!?
wow,
"Neither car is quite as quick as its immediate ancestor though. "
How the hell do you **** that up? Who in the hell would buy a car, either of these, thats slower AND more expensive than the one its replacing?? Its not like these cars got saddled with crippling emissions or crash standards since last year? They have EVERY reason FASTER than their predecessors?!?
wow,
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sjice
Videos
22
Apr 27, 2005 05:39 PM