alternative to the HD GO PRO cam for $55...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2011 | 01:58 AM
  #1  
ldivinag's Avatar
Thread Starter
03.23.67 - 06.14.13
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,495
From: N37 39* W122 3*
alternative to the HD GO PRO cam for $55...

http://www.hobbypartz.com/86p-948h-hd-minicam.html

well the footage doesnt have the silly fisheye look like the HD GO PRO.

but then there are other trade-offs... like mounting systems. user interface (if you thought the GO PRO had a crappy one...). support???...

but for $55...
Old May 17, 2011 | 03:28 AM
  #2  
chimchimm5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,312
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: 2011 WRX hatch gray
Originally Posted by ldivinag
http://www.hobbypartz.com/86p-948h-hd-minicam.html

well the footage doesnt have the silly fisheye look like the HD GO PRO.

but then there are other trade-offs... like mounting systems. user interface (if you thought the GO PRO had a crappy one...). support???...

but for $55...
The GoPro have the "fisheye" because the view is 170 degrees, aka wide angle.

Although it results in a fisheye effect when the video is smooshed into the standard video aspect ratio, it's more ideally suited for the applications the GoPro is used for... extreme sports.

The one you linked looks like a 80 degree view angle, which you would find misses a lot. However, it does look like a pretty interesting cam for just $55.
Old May 17, 2011 | 10:25 AM
  #3  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Originally Posted by ldivinag
http://www.hobbypartz.com/86p-948h-hd-minicam.html

well the footage doesnt have the silly fisheye look like the HD GO PRO.

but then there are other trade-offs... like mounting systems. user interface (if you thought the GO PRO had a crappy one...). support???...

but for $55...
"HD Ready" (? )

FTL

720 isn't 1080

but as you said- for $55,
...you could split screen 4 of them for less than a GoPro
Old May 17, 2011 | 11:36 AM
  #4  
ldivinag's Avatar
Thread Starter
03.23.67 - 06.14.13
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,495
From: N37 39* W122 3*
i'm thinking of getting a pair of these for a 3D experiment i read in a magazine...
Old May 17, 2011 | 12:23 PM
  #5  
04caliwrx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,581
From: on the way to lake tahoe to shread! turbo beast
Car Info: 2016 WRX, 2014 lifter forester XT, 2005 JDM207 WGN
thats will also not look as good a a gopro, lok how small the lenz is lol
Old May 17, 2011 | 12:47 PM
  #6  
asoka05's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 412
From: Bay Area, CA
Car Info: 05 WRX
Originally Posted by psoper
"HD Ready" (? )

FTL

720 isn't 1080

but as you said- for $55,
...you could split screen 4 of them for less than a GoPro
actually, 720p is HD

1080p is Full HD

so yeah, technically, it is HD
Old May 17, 2011 | 06:37 PM
  #7  
ldivinag's Avatar
Thread Starter
03.23.67 - 06.14.13
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,495
From: N37 39* W122 3*
No such thing as Full HD. you are either in HD or you're not.

When the ATSC specs were finalized 720p and 1080i were.the 2 choices broadcasters went to.

ABC/Disney went with 720p due to.them owning ESPN and because of the nature of fast moving sports went with the progressive scanning.

Fox, NBC, CBS and PBS went with 1080i. Why? They said it gave a better picture with the reasoning more lines is better...

Man its more than a decade.ago I picked up my first HDTV. Funny that it "converted" everything to 1080i. So I never really experience 720p natively. Early reports said that CBS had a better.picture whenit.came to Sunday football. Of course CBS may have had better hardware at.the time.

These days 1080p... or even 4k resolution is the latest.buzz words going around. Last couple years or so i heard somewhere in Japan they are testing Super HD which is twice.of 1080i...

Me? I am satisfied with either ATSC specs...
Old May 17, 2011 | 10:14 PM
  #8  
07wrx4life's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,161
From: San Mateo, Cali
Car Info: 06 GMC Diesel
Originally Posted by ldivinag
Last couple years or so i heard somewhere in Japan they are testing Super HD which is twice.of 1080i...

Googled It and found It true, they are going to come out with a new format. But how long will It take before the majority of the TV stations pick It up

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra_H...ion_Television
Old May 18, 2011 | 12:01 AM
  #9  
dTek's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 401
From: Fairfield, CA earning my stripes
Car Info: 2011 WRX Sedan
well japan is also making 3D **** so who cars about HD lol. Oh and 30fps is weaksauce for action sports imo. 60fps or gtfo. and yes I know youtube downgrades everything to 30fps but youtube is weaksauce too. Im going gopro
Old May 18, 2011 | 07:26 AM
  #10  
OneManArmy's Avatar
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
Originally Posted by dTek
well japan is also making 3D **** so who cars about HD lol. Oh and 30fps is weaksauce for action sports imo. 60fps or gtfo. and yes I know youtube downgrades everything to 30fps but youtube is weaksauce too. Im going gopro
60fps is overkill on most home set ups and makes everything seem slower. I have my go pro set up at 960 tall at 30 and it comes out killer and doesn't blow through memory for no reason. Im not making stuff for the big screen.
Old May 18, 2011 | 07:58 AM
  #11  
bluwrxwgn's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,074
From: BAIC Wagon Clique
Car Info: '02 WRB WRX Wagon
Originally Posted by OneManArmy
60fps is overkill on most home set ups and makes everything seem slower. I have my go pro set up at 960 tall at 30 and it comes out killer and doesn't blow through memory for no reason. Im not making stuff for the big screen.
Yea I've recorded on my contour both 60fps and 30fps, the 30fps is smoother the majority of the time.
Old May 19, 2011 | 01:00 AM
  #12  
ldivinag's Avatar
Thread Starter
03.23.67 - 06.14.13
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,495
From: N37 39* W122 3*
Originally Posted by 07wrx4life
Googled It and found It true, they are going to come out with a new format. But how long will It take before the majority of the TV stations pick It up

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra_H...ion_Television
i remember seeing a demo from CES like 4-5 years ago from a major high end video projector company. they were demoing a system using 2 projectors running 1080i and were sync using a special "black box" so it was giving out a 1080p signal.

i couldnt tell a diff when they A/B'ed from 1080i and 1080p...

now, i dont know if anyone watched the TORC series shown on HD THEATER on comcast's HD channels. the series was captured using RED cameras. these suckers have the capabilities to capture up to 4 THOUSAND LINES OF RESOLUTION!!!! 4k!!!!!

Originally Posted by bluwrxwgn
Yea I've recorded on my contour both 60fps and 30fps, the 30fps is smoother the majority of the time.
i would use the 60fps (and higher) if i were to record footage exclusively to do slow motion stuff...
Old May 19, 2011 | 09:34 AM
  #13  
papakiet's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,358
From: Fremont
Car Info: Smokin' Joe
Originally Posted by dTek
well japan is also making 3D **** so who cars about HD lol.
hmmmm.... a mosaic censor in 3D huh... that should be interesting
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Krinkov
Bay Area
30
Feb 22, 2011 12:48 PM
EJ25RS
Bay Area
0
Mar 14, 2003 01:25 AM
kenchan
Interior, Exterior & Lighting
5
Dec 14, 2002 08:50 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:08 AM.