1999 Dodge Viper For Sale on Craigslist
01-15-2010, 10:40 PM
#48
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Leandro, CA
Posts: 3,856
Car Info: Forester XTi
but that said, sorry, no, they were all skanks, you could pick up better looking women on sunset.
01-15-2010, 10:54 PM
#49
01-16-2010, 11:04 AM
#54
01-16-2010, 11:13 AM
#55
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: www.gunatics.com
Posts: 19,930
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
I love when guys sit there and criticize girls like these, girls that they could only WISH to get in real life...
The best is when a guy is in a relationship with a "less than desirable" looking gal, but comes online and talks smack about girls that are like 100x better looking then their significant other.
Butterfaces? If ANY of these girls came up to any of you, you wouldn't complain about any kind of butterfaceness, you'd prolly come here and post pictures of her in one of the "show off your GF" threads.
I'm not pointing out any one in particular, but I can't stand it when guys sit there and criticize women online or on TV even though the same guys couldn't get a woman anywhere near the caliber of the said woman that he is criticizing.
(pardon my grammar, I posted that on my I-touch and didn't go back to edit or proofread anything, but Im sure most guys here would agree with me)
The best is when a guy is in a relationship with a "less than desirable" looking gal, but comes online and talks smack about girls that are like 100x better looking then their significant other.
Butterfaces? If ANY of these girls came up to any of you, you wouldn't complain about any kind of butterfaceness, you'd prolly come here and post pictures of her in one of the "show off your GF" threads.
I'm not pointing out any one in particular, but I can't stand it when guys sit there and criticize women online or on TV even though the same guys couldn't get a woman anywhere near the caliber of the said woman that he is criticizing.
(pardon my grammar, I posted that on my I-touch and didn't go back to edit or proofread anything, but Im sure most guys here would agree with me)
01-16-2010, 11:20 AM
#56
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: www.gunatics.com
Posts: 19,930
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
Edit: Though I said the above, going back and looking at some of those pics, I have to agree that a couple of those gals are def not of my liking and I def would NOT date them if I were single and they wanted to go out on a date, but the rest of them aren't ugly, not ugly enough to call them butterfaces.
It's funny how girls online and on TV (magazines, etc) are put on some higher scale where they have to be friggin KNOCK OUTS in order for anyone to even notice them... In contrast, if a girl that you call ugly from the magazine picture came up to you in real life and asked you out, you'd be like "HELL YES!!!" because girls in real life aren't held to the same high scale that published women are? Why is that?
It's funny how girls online and on TV (magazines, etc) are put on some higher scale where they have to be friggin KNOCK OUTS in order for anyone to even notice them... In contrast, if a girl that you call ugly from the magazine picture came up to you in real life and asked you out, you'd be like "HELL YES!!!" because girls in real life aren't held to the same high scale that published women are? Why is that?
01-16-2010, 06:08 PM
#57
I love when guys sit there and criticize girls like these, girls that they could only WISH to get in real life...
The best is when a guy is in a relationship with a "less than desirable" looking gal, but comes online and talks smack about girls that are like 100x better looking then their significant other.
Butterfaces? If ANY of these girls came up to any of you, you wouldn't complain about any kind of butterfaceness, you'd prolly come here and post pictures of her in one of the "show off your GF" threads.
I'm not pointing out any one in particular, but I can't stand it when guys sit there and criticize women online or on TV even though the same guys couldn't get a woman anywhere near the caliber of the said woman that he is criticizing.
(pardon my grammar, I posted that on my I-touch and didn't go back to edit or proofread anything, but Im sure most guys here would agree with me)
The best is when a guy is in a relationship with a "less than desirable" looking gal, but comes online and talks smack about girls that are like 100x better looking then their significant other.
Butterfaces? If ANY of these girls came up to any of you, you wouldn't complain about any kind of butterfaceness, you'd prolly come here and post pictures of her in one of the "show off your GF" threads.
I'm not pointing out any one in particular, but I can't stand it when guys sit there and criticize women online or on TV even though the same guys couldn't get a woman anywhere near the caliber of the said woman that he is criticizing.
(pardon my grammar, I posted that on my I-touch and didn't go back to edit or proofread anything, but Im sure most guys here would agree with me)
Edit: Though I said the above, going back and looking at some of those pics, I have to agree that a couple of those gals are def not of my liking and I def would NOT date them if I were single and they wanted to go out on a date, but the rest of them aren't ugly, not ugly enough to call them butterfaces.
It's funny how girls online and on TV (magazines, etc) are put on some higher scale where they have to be friggin KNOCK OUTS in order for anyone to even notice them... In contrast, if a girl that you call ugly from the magazine picture came up to you in real life and asked you out, you'd be like "HELL YES!!!" because girls in real life aren't held to the same high scale that published women are? Why is that?
It's funny how girls online and on TV (magazines, etc) are put on some higher scale where they have to be friggin KNOCK OUTS in order for anyone to even notice them... In contrast, if a girl that you call ugly from the magazine picture came up to you in real life and asked you out, you'd be like "HELL YES!!!" because girls in real life aren't held to the same high scale that published women are? Why is that?
