108,920 hp at 102 rpm
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,413
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Car Info: Twin WRX Turbo VR-4
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,531
From: Bike Lane
Car Info: Black 2003 WRX Sedan
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 231
From: Silly Valley, CA
Car Info: 2003 Impreza WRX Sedan Midnight Black Pearl
That would make a pretty slow race car.
Assuming you could put wheels on the engine that weighed nothing...
Quarter Mile Acceleration and Terminal Speed Comparison
Car 1
Horsepower: 400 hp
Weight: 3000 lbs.
Car 2
Horsepower: 108,920 hp
Weight: 46000 lbs.
Results
Car 1
Car 1: 12.491 seconds
Car 1: 119.55 mph
Car 2
Car 2: 48.014 seconds
Car 2: 31.122 mph
Car 1 is faster than car 2 by 35.523 seconds
Car 1 has a higher terminal speed than car 2 by 88.428 mph
Assuming you could put wheels on the engine that weighed nothing...
Quarter Mile Acceleration and Terminal Speed Comparison
Car 1
Horsepower: 400 hp
Weight: 3000 lbs.
Car 2
Horsepower: 108,920 hp
Weight: 46000 lbs.
Results
Car 1
Car 1: 12.491 seconds
Car 1: 119.55 mph
Car 2
Car 2: 48.014 seconds
Car 2: 31.122 mph
Car 1 is faster than car 2 by 35.523 seconds
Car 1 has a higher terminal speed than car 2 by 88.428 mph
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,670
From: East Bay / Pomona
Car Info: '02 PSM WRX
Originally Posted by Krinkov
its really not that big, those are just oompa loompas putting it together



Oompa loompas... asians.... same thing

(and yes I am asian)
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,138
From: Monterey Bay, Ca
Car Info: WR Blue Wagon
They have an article on that bad boy in the current issue of Diesel Power magazine. 100,000HP doesn't mean much. It's the 5 MILLION or so lb/ft of torque it puts out that gets stuff moving
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



