1/22/06: Today Will Go Down as One of the GREATEST Days in History!!?
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,539
From: only tourists & kids call it "Frisco!"
Car Info: baby blue TRICK STAR on pink TUFF II's (MIA) =(
some more of Kobe's #'s on the night......
shot 28-of-46 61%!?
from the floor, including 7-of-13 from 3-point range and 18-of-20 from the foul line (had his string of 62 STRAIGHT made w/out a miss snapped though)
Kobe's complete stat line.......
Name Min FG 3Pt FT Off Reb Ast TO Stl Blk PF Pts
K. Bryant 41 28-46 7-13 18-20 2 6 2 3 3 1 1 81
shot 28-of-46 61%!?
from the floor, including 7-of-13 from 3-point range and 18-of-20 from the foul line (had his string of 62 STRAIGHT made w/out a miss snapped though)Kobe's complete stat line.......
Name Min FG 3Pt FT Off Reb Ast TO Stl Blk PF Pts
K. Bryant 41 28-46 7-13 18-20 2 6 2 3 3 1 1 81
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,539
From: only tourists & kids call it "Frisco!"
Car Info: baby blue TRICK STAR on pink TUFF II's (MIA) =(
and, while most everyone has been pretty cordial, so far, here's an interesting read for the Kobe critics & or haters lurking out there.........
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_yl...yhoo&type=lgns
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_yl...yhoo&type=lgns
One-man Showtime
By Dan Wetzel, Yahoo! Sports
January 23, 2006
Kobe Bryant scored 81 points on Sunday – enough to rank second all time to Wilt Chamberlain's immortal 100-point game in 1962 and knock the NFL off the front burner of sports conversations – and yet people still will criticize him.
Count on it. They'll say he should have passed more (he had just two assists). They'll say he just did it for the spotlight. They'll point to his 18 misses, not his 28 makes.
They'll go on and on. Only in basketball could a guy score 81 points, make history, send every ticket holder home with a story of a lifetime, cause cell phones across America to ring with "Are you watching this?" calls, generally create amazement and wonder – and still get criticized
But watch it happen.
Kobe Bryant kicked *** Sunday, and if you can't understand that, then you need to try. This wasn't about Bryant being a ball hog or a bad teammate. Quite the contrary. The Los Angeles Lakers were getting pounded by the Toronto Raptors (down 16 at one point) until Kobe looked at his bad teammates and decided to try to win the game – which the Lakers did, 122-104.
"It just happened," Bryant said afterward. "For me, it was all about the W. I thought we were lethargic. I wanted to ride the wave and demoralize our opponent."
And people want to criticize that?
You know, even if a few of those points were unnecessary – and because the game was in doubt until late in the fourth quarter, not many of them were – who cares? Really, what is wrong with trying to make history? Don't the Raptors get paid, too?
If a baseball player hits a home run in his first three at-bats, does anyone blame him for swinging for the fences his next time up? Does anyone complain when a manager doesn't even think to take a tiring pitcher out of a no-hitter, even if it is the best move for the team to win?
When Peyton Manning is trying to set a single-season touchdown record and calls for pass plays on first-and-goal from the 1, does anyone care?
Of course not, you expect it. You demand it, even.
So why in basketball does it matter? Is it because the players are mostly black? Is it because they are prone to preening?
Is it because in basketball you have to play both offense and defense on every single possession you are in the game, and as a result your weaknesses are up for double exposure? Is it because Kobe Bryant can be rather unlikable – be it the Shaquille O'Neal thing, or the Eagle, Colo., thing, or so many other things?
Is it because there remains this "Hoosiers"-inspired purity to the game, even if coach Norman Dale would have wanted Jimmy Chitwood to keep shooting?
Maybe it is all of that above. I don't know.
I do know that back in the 1960s and '70s it wasn't like this. The gunner was celebrated. Pete Maravich, David Thompson, even Larry Bird (in the 1980s) all admittedly were selfish on some nights. It was fun. It was part of the show.
Now, no one even tries to put up big numbers. Prior to Sunday, of the top 25 highest-scoring, non-overtime games in NBA history, only one occurred after 1978 – the 1994 season finale when David Robinson scored 71 to make the case for MVP.
Why have we sucked the fun right out of the game?
Kobe Bryant scored 66.4 percent of his team's points. Wilt, in scoring 100 in his Philadelphia Warriors' 169-147 victory, managed just 59.2 percent. So maybe Kobe's performance was better, especially since he didn't enjoy Wilt's advantage of being 7-foot-1 and 275 pounds in an era of no one else being even close.
By the way, that Warriors score also should end all the other predictable talk about how nobody plays defense in the NBA anymore. Who was playing defense on Wilt's night?
NBA players play defense. They play a ton of defense. One of the great fallacies of basketball is the idea that college guys play harder defense than the pros. Apparently, the sight of a slow guard slapping the floor in a show of "intensity" has clouded reality.
If you think the Raptors wanted Bryant to hang 81 on them, you didn't see the game. They just couldn't stop him. They tried everything, every defender. (even 2, 3, & 4 AT THE SAME TIME)
Kobe was that on. He was that great. It was that much fun.
Yet there will be critics who claim that 81 points in a game isn't sports, that it isn't basketball.
But if you think sending chills down fans' spines isn't sports, then you need to lighten up – and tune in Friday to see if Kobe can hang 101 on Golden State.
By Dan Wetzel, Yahoo! Sports
January 23, 2006
Kobe Bryant scored 81 points on Sunday – enough to rank second all time to Wilt Chamberlain's immortal 100-point game in 1962 and knock the NFL off the front burner of sports conversations – and yet people still will criticize him.
Count on it. They'll say he should have passed more (he had just two assists). They'll say he just did it for the spotlight. They'll point to his 18 misses, not his 28 makes.
They'll go on and on. Only in basketball could a guy score 81 points, make history, send every ticket holder home with a story of a lifetime, cause cell phones across America to ring with "Are you watching this?" calls, generally create amazement and wonder – and still get criticized
But watch it happen.
Kobe Bryant kicked *** Sunday, and if you can't understand that, then you need to try. This wasn't about Bryant being a ball hog or a bad teammate. Quite the contrary. The Los Angeles Lakers were getting pounded by the Toronto Raptors (down 16 at one point) until Kobe looked at his bad teammates and decided to try to win the game – which the Lakers did, 122-104.
"It just happened," Bryant said afterward. "For me, it was all about the W. I thought we were lethargic. I wanted to ride the wave and demoralize our opponent."
And people want to criticize that?
You know, even if a few of those points were unnecessary – and because the game was in doubt until late in the fourth quarter, not many of them were – who cares? Really, what is wrong with trying to make history? Don't the Raptors get paid, too?
If a baseball player hits a home run in his first three at-bats, does anyone blame him for swinging for the fences his next time up? Does anyone complain when a manager doesn't even think to take a tiring pitcher out of a no-hitter, even if it is the best move for the team to win?
When Peyton Manning is trying to set a single-season touchdown record and calls for pass plays on first-and-goal from the 1, does anyone care?
Of course not, you expect it. You demand it, even.
So why in basketball does it matter? Is it because the players are mostly black? Is it because they are prone to preening?
Is it because in basketball you have to play both offense and defense on every single possession you are in the game, and as a result your weaknesses are up for double exposure? Is it because Kobe Bryant can be rather unlikable – be it the Shaquille O'Neal thing, or the Eagle, Colo., thing, or so many other things?
Is it because there remains this "Hoosiers"-inspired purity to the game, even if coach Norman Dale would have wanted Jimmy Chitwood to keep shooting?
Maybe it is all of that above. I don't know.
I do know that back in the 1960s and '70s it wasn't like this. The gunner was celebrated. Pete Maravich, David Thompson, even Larry Bird (in the 1980s) all admittedly were selfish on some nights. It was fun. It was part of the show.
Now, no one even tries to put up big numbers. Prior to Sunday, of the top 25 highest-scoring, non-overtime games in NBA history, only one occurred after 1978 – the 1994 season finale when David Robinson scored 71 to make the case for MVP.
Why have we sucked the fun right out of the game?
Kobe Bryant scored 66.4 percent of his team's points. Wilt, in scoring 100 in his Philadelphia Warriors' 169-147 victory, managed just 59.2 percent. So maybe Kobe's performance was better, especially since he didn't enjoy Wilt's advantage of being 7-foot-1 and 275 pounds in an era of no one else being even close.
By the way, that Warriors score also should end all the other predictable talk about how nobody plays defense in the NBA anymore. Who was playing defense on Wilt's night?
NBA players play defense. They play a ton of defense. One of the great fallacies of basketball is the idea that college guys play harder defense than the pros. Apparently, the sight of a slow guard slapping the floor in a show of "intensity" has clouded reality.
If you think the Raptors wanted Bryant to hang 81 on them, you didn't see the game. They just couldn't stop him. They tried everything, every defender. (even 2, 3, & 4 AT THE SAME TIME)

Kobe was that on. He was that great. It was that much fun.
Yet there will be critics who claim that 81 points in a game isn't sports, that it isn't basketball.
But if you think sending chills down fans' spines isn't sports, then you need to lighten up – and tune in Friday to see if Kobe can hang 101 on Golden State.
Originally Posted by CLsmooth71
some more of Kobe's #'s on the night......
shot 28-of-46 61%!?
from the floor, including 7-of-13 from 3-point range and 18-of-20 from the foul line (had his string of 62 STRAIGHT made w/out a miss snapped though)
Kobe's complete stat line.......
Name Min FG 3Pt FT Off Reb Ast TO Stl Blk PF Pts
K. Bryant 41 28-46 7-13 18-20 2 6 2 3 3 1 1 81
shot 28-of-46 61%!?
from the floor, including 7-of-13 from 3-point range and 18-of-20 from the foul line (had his string of 62 STRAIGHT made w/out a miss snapped though)Kobe's complete stat line.......
Name Min FG 3Pt FT Off Reb Ast TO Stl Blk PF Pts
K. Bryant 41 28-46 7-13 18-20 2 6 2 3 3 1 1 81
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
great game. Definately has as much to fight for as any for the number one spot. Definately a top 5 ever.
I'm actually more impressed with that than I am with Wilt's 100. Call me crazy. But wilt was the biggest guy on the floor by a TON and just got fed in the low post over and over again. What's harder...shooting over guys half your size from 10 feet and under all night or shooting over guys taller than you and sometimes 2 and 3 guys from EVERYWHERE.
impressive...any way you look at it.
Wilt game was all about offense...no defense anywhere...300 points scored in that game...come on. Kobe's team was loosing and he won it ALONE.
If kobe only cared about points he would have finished up the game he had 62 in 3 quarters and gotten to a 100 then.
As for everyone saying he'll never do it again....my bet is that kobe breaks 60 at least 5 more times in his career. Shoot I wouldn't be surprised if he busts for 70 again this YEAR.
I'm actually more impressed with that than I am with Wilt's 100. Call me crazy. But wilt was the biggest guy on the floor by a TON and just got fed in the low post over and over again. What's harder...shooting over guys half your size from 10 feet and under all night or shooting over guys taller than you and sometimes 2 and 3 guys from EVERYWHERE.
impressive...any way you look at it.
Wilt game was all about offense...no defense anywhere...300 points scored in that game...come on. Kobe's team was loosing and he won it ALONE.
If kobe only cared about points he would have finished up the game he had 62 in 3 quarters and gotten to a 100 then.
As for everyone saying he'll never do it again....my bet is that kobe breaks 60 at least 5 more times in his career. Shoot I wouldn't be surprised if he busts for 70 again this YEAR.
BanHammer™
iTrader: (8)
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 47,596
From: Wagonmafia Propaganda Lieutenant
Car Info: 2014 Forester XT
mad props.. I did think anyone would even get close to Wilts record.. he was not that far off
as much as I hate him (because he is too friggen good and will kill you from anywhere on the court if he has a chance) awesome job Kobe ...
as much as I hate him (because he is too friggen good and will kill you from anywhere on the court if he has a chance) awesome job Kobe ...
VIP Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,642
From: CAL - California
Car Info: AWD & RWD JDM
Originally Posted by HomerJay
I'm glad you support rapists. 

p.s. Laker fan - not a Kobe fan; although Kobe plus Shaq minus drama resulted in 3 straight titles, and the only time Kobe was good for the team, i.e. what's good for Kobe doesn't result in what's good for the Lakers - and what's up with not wanting to play in the Olympics; America wants the gold yo!
Last edited by herrjr; Jan 23, 2006 at 03:21 PM.
Originally Posted by zumnwrx
eh i thought this was going to be about how the steelers are going to
THE SUPER BOWL!

THE SUPER BOWL!

Hell YES!!!!!! Wave those terrible towels. Go Steelers!!!!!


