Domestic Terrorism at SFSU (http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=15855)

Was this a peaceful protest?
Not if you consider yelling death threats a peaceful activity.
How many of these terrorists were arrested?
Oh, that's right, none.

I dare psoper or Unregistered to defend this rubbish.

On a positive note, some of those wannebe suicide bombers are hot!

I DEFEND IT!

Ohhh yeah!

Why would I defend these actions?

Although I wouldn't call them terrorist.....

I don't think Psoper would defend those dorks either.
Funny thing is that the DNC has done more for Israel than any political group in history, but these clowns are too FOB to realize it.

Did you guys look into the website that posted that article? David Horowitz is heavily involved, a man that is pretty far to the right.

Im not defending the actions of those people, but:
1. Calling them terrorists is a farce
2. They have a right to free speech
3. We are reading a completely biased source

I participated in a peace rally at UC Davis back in 2001 and there was the same type of stuff. Amongst the many hundreds of people there, only a few had child-like, nasty exchanges. Anyways, I could see the same thing being true for this event.

BTW, did any of you actually see this go down at SFSU?

Did you guys look into the website that posted that article? David Horowitz is heavily involved, a man that is pretty far to the right.

Im not defending the actions of those people, but:
1. Calling them terrorists is a farce
2. They have a right to free speech
3. We are reading a completely biased source

I participated in a peace rally at UC Davis back in 2001 and there was the same type of stuff. Amongst the many hundreds of people there, only a few had child-like, nasty exchanges. Anyways, I could see the same thing being true for this event.

BTW, did any of you actually see this go down at SFSU?

“The only way we can defeat you is to kill as many as possible! I’d rather die a suicide bomber’s death than to call myself an American!”

1.This is a terroristic threat. Thus the person making the statement is a terrorist.
2.Contrary to what you might feel, the Fist Ammendment comes with limitations.
3. Yes. But does that make the information completely unreliable?

1. uncorroborated
2. FREE Speech (that would mean free to speak your mind)
3. Yes it does. It isnt a credible source.

So ok Oaf what about the anti abortion people and the threats and actions they have made in the past and present. Terrorist?

So ok Oaf what about the anti abortion people and the threats and actions they have made in the past and present. Terrorist?

Yes & they should be treated as such.

1. uncorroborated
2. FREE Speech (that would mean free to speak your mind)
3. Yes it does. It isnt a credible source.

Look, you & I don't have the freedom to say whatever we want, when/where ever we want.
These terrorists enjoy the same lack of freedom that we have.

BTW you know damn well that if it was SFGate reporting about Right Wing Anti Abortionists protesting "Planned Parenthood" clinics you'd be claiming that it was the Gospel truth.

On a positive note, some of those wannebe suicide bombers are hot!

If you like unibrows and burkhas.

So ok Oaf what about the anti abortion people and the threats and actions they have made in the past and present. Terrorist?

How about people saying they want to kill mexicans? That's hate speach, partner!

This sort of thing IS NOT protected speech.