Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM) There is replacement for displacement, it is forced induction - OEM 2.0 liter turbo engines in the USDM WRX. 90-94 Legacy Turbo EJ22 turbo engines can also be discussed here.

Don't crucify me, but....Superchargers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2005 | 09:35 AM
  #1  
Kreb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8
Don't crucify me, but....Superchargers?

I used to spend some time with a hybrid - base Impreza with a WRX drivetrain bolted in and really loved the car except for the turbo lag. Below 3500 RPM it was pretty lacking. Now it's well documented that you can get a turbo WRX well above the stock 227 hp, but has anyone tried putting a roots or scroll type supercharger on one in place of the Turbo?

I know that you're going to loose on the top end potential - no question. But I'd think that you could get similar HP to a stock turbo with a broader powerband. For street and auto-X I'd rather have a motor that comes on at 1500 RPM and makes 225 HP, than a motor that makes 275 and comes on at 3500.

Set aside cost, complexity and smog check issues for the moment - what do you think of the concept, and has anyone done it?
Old Feb 25, 2005 | 10:49 AM
  #2  
RedStage's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,143
From: Yokohama, Japan
Car Info: Ver IV STi Wagon
"Crusifictions?"

"Yes."

"Good, line on the left, two doors down, one cross each."

Couldn't resist.
Old Feb 25, 2005 | 08:45 PM
  #3  
tim's Avatar
tim
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 40
Okay, for starters I must say that I am currently driving a 2000 RS. I sold my WRX a few months ago. There is a lot of talk on the RS forums about the whold supercharger thing. One advantage we have is that our engines are 25% bigger than yours. Our compression is quite a bit higher than a WRX, so when you add a little boost--like the five or so pounds that a small subercharger gives--you can get some pretty nice results (compared to what you had before). One of the conclusions that the other RS guys have some to is that superchargers for our relatively small engines do not make a lot of sense. You would need a really good supercharger to even come close to the power you make on your stock WRX engine. A much better solution would be to get a different turbo for your WRX. A lot of people have said that a P&P on their stock turbo (usualy done by deadbodt @ www.deadboltspeed.com) when coupled with a truly good exhaust system and engine management can yield astounding results. You should spool a lot faster. Try searching the forums for more info on this. Im not sure if he is a member here, but Jerry from deadbolt is a member of NASIOC... If you find out anything on other forums, keep us posted.
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 12:03 AM
  #4  
Wingless Wonder's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,029
From: Sacramento CA
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX sedan
See the last two issues of Sport Compact Car Magazine for in-depth feature articles on street supercharging for imports. Yes, they can work great but no one has developed a bolt-on kit for the Subaru flat-four that I'm aware of. Packaging the blower is the major hurdle on any installation.

--
0==WW==0
"…axles of evil…" - george w. bush
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 09:57 AM
  #5  
Kreb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8
That's useful information. Thanks! I'd prefer a turbo if I was confident that I could get significant boost by 2k, but waiting to 3.5k doesn't appeal to me.

Specifically I'm thinking of another kit car build.

Here's my current car: http://www.smm.com/gallery/Berkeley-Choate-24?page=1

The Stalker put's out 200 HP and 200 ft. lbs. and weighs about 1400 lbs. I'd like to get similar power out of my next build while dropping a couple hundred pounds. Since I don't have to deal with smog, A/C, power steering et cetera, I've got plenty of room to do mods.

So if I go Subaru (which I'm definitely leaning towards) the least expensive way would be to put a N/A 2.5 in there, and I could always add a SC in the future. OTOH if I could get a WRX modded to put out power over a broader band, I'd have a lot more giddiup from the start...

Any other feedback?
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 10:52 AM
  #6  
meilers's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,023
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car Info: Subaru Impreza WRX 2002
I wouldn't say with any confidence at all that you could "always add a SC in the future." There are a ton of serious issues involved in supercharging a flat-four motor, which explains why, as WW noted, there is no one making a supercharger kit for any boxer engine.

Just a small sample of the problems:

1) a supercharger is a belt-driven acessory, but none of the EJ20/EJ25 pulleys turn fast enough to actually drive it. There is a LONG and detailed account of a NASOIC member trying to mount a Mercedes "Kompressor" supercharger on a 2.5l N/A block, and that was just one of a huge host of problems he faced; he ended up using outrageously oversized pulleys and gears to get up to the speed the SC expected. Most superchargers turn at 10,000 RPM or more just to generate 3-4 PSI.

2) Where do you mount it? In straight and V-mounted engines, the supercharger likes to sit right on top of the intake manifold, which is why they poke up right through the hood of blown big-blocks; where to mount it is much less clear with a horizontally-opposed block.

3) Boost creep at high RPMs is a very serious problem; a friend of mine has the new Stillen supercharger on his 350z and he has to watch his RPMs and fuel pressure constantly; the engine leans out like crazy and detonates constantly, and I'm certain it won't last six months. He's trying to rig an external wastegate, but it is requiring lots of custom fabrication.

Look up that thread about the Mercedes supercharger on NASOIC, you'll see what I mean.
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 01:50 AM
  #7  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Although I think a supercharger on an NA 2.5 could probably be made to work, a different approach for you might be to start with an STI block and bolt on a smaller turbo (maybe a stock wrx turbo). The 2.5l should spool the little TD04 extremely quickly and should give you some very usable torque as low as 2000-2200RPM. Power will certainly fall off up top, but you should still end up with atleast as much top end as a lightly modded WRX... probably a bit more with the extra displacement. I don't think anyone has tried this, but I bet it would work well for your requirements and would be much easier than fabricating a supercharger setup.

Another option would be a good anti-lag system

-- Ed

EQ Tuning
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 06:58 PM
  #8  
reddevil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 50
I am the one who stuck the Eaton m-62 onto my 2.2 1990 legacy. My main problems were money, money and money. Since I was doing all the fab work myself except for some welding and alumnium work, I was doing it all on the cheap (and it still took me about 2 grand to do).

But, it is working fine and dandy now. Of course stuff like this always needs tweaking, but for now, it is running good enough for me to attempt a track day on March 5th at PIR.

I had to upgrade exhaust and fuel of course, but I am running 7 psi at 2000 rpm and 9 psi at 6000 rpm. I also don't have ABS which is a major factor in mounting.

Here is my thread on the subject.

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=605625
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 09:36 PM
  #9  
meilers's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,023
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car Info: Subaru Impreza WRX 2002
Holy s***, you are in Phoenix?? Cool, so am I. Let us know how your track day turns out.
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 09:50 PM
  #10  
RussB's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,351
From: pompous douchebag
Car Info: $200,000 sports car
Originally Posted by vaus
Although I think a supercharger on an NA 2.5 could probably be made to work, a different approach for you might be to start with an STI block and bolt on a smaller turbo (maybe a stock wrx turbo). The 2.5l should spool the little TD04 extremely quickly and should give you some very usable torque as low as 2000-2200RPM. Power will certainly fall off up top, but you should still end up with atleast as much top end as a lightly modded WRX... probably a bit more with the extra displacement. I don't think anyone has tried this, but I bet it would work well for your requirements and would be much easier than fabricating a supercharger setup.

Another option would be a good anti-lag system

-- Ed

EQ Tuning
the big engine / small turbo combo sounds promising. perhaps something between the WRX and the STi turbo would be in order... something along the lines of a vf35.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 09:30 AM
  #11  
reddevil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 50
Sorry, Portland. PIR = Portland International Raceway, at least around here.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 05:21 PM
  #12  
mbquarts's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,180
From: An ALMS race near you
Car Info: 03 MBP WRX
There's a thread somewhere about a tuner developing a turbo and supercharged STi.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 08:00 PM
  #13  
fastnoypi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 152
double quote
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 08:02 PM
  #14  
fastnoypi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 152
F.A.T in phoenix has a shop car 2.5L STi thats supercharged and turbo charged..not sure if they still have it but was very intresting to see in person.
it had a mercedes supercharger and a pretty large turbo to demonstrate the supercharger's ability to take care of the down low.
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #15  
dubRexer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 263
From: $$white for da clean, gold for da bling$$
Car Info: white/gold sti
I believe I've seen jackson doing something for an RS... not quite sure, definitely not for wrx.. my buddy had a 450 whp prelude running a jackson s/c ~ built and tuned at 16 in chitown. straight z06 eater.. and that being said, party on garth.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:17 AM.