Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM) There is replacement for displacement, it is forced induction - OEM 2.0 liter turbo engines in the USDM WRX. 90-94 Legacy Turbo EJ22 turbo engines can also be discussed here.

Intake Debate...Needed or Not???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 11:31 AM
  #2  
KmanRuffian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 313
From: Atlanta/Cayman Islands
Car Info: 2002 White WRX Wagon (WWW)
Ok as far as I understand, the reason that people don't see any gains from intakes is this:
It is a turbo car, the turbo sucks the air in and rams it into the engine. The pressure going into the engine is controlled by what is for all purposes a simple valve. The computer controls the "boost" or pressure of the air going into the engine by controlling that valve. The turbo can create more pressure than the engine needs at most times (so long as it is spinning) so making it easier for the turbo to suck air is not gonna give you more air going into the engine because the turbo is already doing a well enough (or better) job of supplying the engine with air. It may reduce the load on your turbo ever so slightly but what's that gonna do? Does this make sense? In a naturally aspirated car you want to free up the intake as much as possible because it is the engine itself sucking the air in. If you free up the intake on a NA car it can suck more air and more easily, allowing more air into the engine and that equals a power gain of some amount. Does this make sense? Also the reason cold air intakes are not gonna do anything is that the air gets super heated in the turbo so that slightly colder air being sucked from the wheel well doesn't equate to anything really... Anyway if this isn't clear enough I'll try again later, or someone else can step in and clarify....
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 11:34 AM
  #3  
WindingRoad's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,331
From: San Francisco / Riverside
Car Info: 2004 White GDB
i say get samco turbo inlet hoses before an air intake
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 10:00 PM
  #4  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
Get a nice flowing filter like a K&N/Perrin/Green etc.

That's all you need really. Unless you want the hear the turbo spool, BOV and Wastegate flutter more, then keep the intake.

-Gagan
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 10:13 PM
  #5  
killaho's Avatar
UTR Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,628
From: Spokane
Car Info: 93 Impreza L
hks mushroom is a good filter too. doesnt mess with the maf sensor because its not oiled
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 10:18 PM
  #6  
yayitzian's Avatar
Hurray, it's Ian!!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,612
From: on an airplane
Car Info: 2002 MBP WRX Sedan
https://www.i-club.com/forums/showth...277#post310277

this link here above gives you a perfect response to any questions you have about getting any sort of intake for your car. read it thoroughly, live by it. haha.
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 10:38 PM
  #7  
DarkAngel's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 593
From: SF Bay
You can get a Flex up pipe for the price of an intake and you will def get much better performance.
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 10:45 PM
  #8  
Choku Dori's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,425
From: Under your bed, in your closet, and in your head
Car Info: Corvette Z51
*sigh* Once again, I preach the good news of the Green panel filter and removed silencer. I decry the CEL and power performance woes that result from short rams and CAI's. Get a short ram only if you're running 300+hp or a larger turbo. I am likely to post this same reply in another thread before the year's up
Old Dec 26, 2003 | 01:09 AM
  #9  
Max Xevious's Avatar
BanHammer™
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 47,596
From: Wagonmafia Propaganda Lieutenant
Car Info: 2014 Forester XT
dropin - silencer removal

BEST COMBO EVER
Old Dec 26, 2003 | 10:36 AM
  #10  
Wingless Wonder's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,029
From: Sacramento CA
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX sedan
Origami posted by Pogi
I hear of people that air intake systems(cold or short ram) doesn't really do any good performance gains. Is this true?
Please see 'sticky' thread near top of page.

--
0==WW==0
"…axles of evil…" - george w. bush
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 12:09 AM
  #11  
trebsrex's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,696
From: CT by Da Bay and Salinas
Car Info: Old Brighton
Originally posted by Scott@S-Squared
dropin - silencer removal

BEST COMBO EVER
The same setup as mine
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 01:38 AM
  #12  
oldmansan's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,176
From: Southern California
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
Some of us

run a FMIC, so an intake is necessary.

San
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 10:59 AM
  #13  
Max Xevious's Avatar
BanHammer™
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 47,596
From: Wagonmafia Propaganda Lieutenant
Car Info: 2014 Forester XT
Im still waiting to have someone do a fmic with a stock airbox and see what kind of power they can make with it
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 12:39 PM
  #14  
oldmansan's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,176
From: Southern California
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
I can't use a stock airbox

because the FMIC piping uses that space.

San
Attached Thumbnails Intake Debate...Needed or Not???-fmic.jpg  
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 05:58 PM
  #15  
awns729's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,568
From: Rockland County...NY
Car Info: want a WRX
the maf compesates for the extra air by adding fuel, which basically means an intake doesnt do ****



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:46 AM.