2006 Bmw M2
2006 Bmw M2
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally posted by CLsmooth71
looks like a RSX/E46 M3 bastard on steroids.....i don't really like it.
looks like a RSX/E46 M3 bastard on steroids.....i don't really like it.
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,539
From: only tourists & kids call it "Frisco!"
Car Info: baby blue TRICK STAR on pink TUFF II's (MIA) =(
Originally posted by BAN SUVS
300 hp + 6 speed + RWD + <3000 pounds + BMW build quality = good. Who cares what it looks like. ****Remember the Mcoupe?****
300 hp + 6 speed + RWD + <3000 pounds + BMW build quality = good. Who cares what it looks like. ****Remember the Mcoupe?****
It's undeniable that the overwhelming factor that car buyers consider when making purchases is looks/appearance, especially as sticker prices go up!
Originally posted by BAN SUVS
I don't think it'll happen. Doesn't fit Toyota's marketing strategy. They aren't about performance anymore.
I don't think it'll happen. Doesn't fit Toyota's marketing strategy. They aren't about performance anymore.
Originally posted by CLsmooth71
That's not really a good selling point....the M-Coupes came, went, and are loooong gone.....mostly because they were dang expen$ive and even more so.....FUGLY.
That's not really a good selling point....the M-Coupes came, went, and are loooong gone.....mostly because they were dang expen$ive and even more so.....FUGLY.
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally posted by CLsmooth71
That's not really a good selling point....the M-Coupes came, went, and are loooong gone.....mostly because they were dang expen$ive and even more so.....FUGLY.
It's undeniable that the overwhelming factor that car buyers consider when making purchases is looks/appearance, especially as sticker prices go up!
That's not really a good selling point....the M-Coupes came, went, and are loooong gone.....mostly because they were dang expen$ive and even more so.....FUGLY.
It's undeniable that the overwhelming factor that car buyers consider when making purchases is looks/appearance, especially as sticker prices go up!
M2= teh winnar. It will sticker for a little less than $40k, same as the Lotus.
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,539
From: only tourists & kids call it "Frisco!"
Car Info: baby blue TRICK STAR on pink TUFF II's (MIA) =(
Originally posted by nKoan
Ah man, I loved the way the M Coupe looked. If I had the money, I would have bought one in a second.
Ah man, I loved the way the M Coupe looked. If I had the money, I would have bought one in a second.
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally posted by CLsmooth71
oops, sorry!! I think i can get you a good deal on an Aztec or Gremlin tho!
oops, sorry!! I think i can get you a good deal on an Aztec or Gremlin tho!
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,539
From: only tourists & kids call it "Frisco!"
Car Info: baby blue TRICK STAR on pink TUFF II's (MIA) =(
Originally posted by BAN SUVS
The point I was making was that the M coupe was probably the single biggest performance bargain of the 90's, even without the super duper 3.2 liter motor. It kicked ***, and now they are putting a superior drivetrain into a very similar sized car.
M2= teh winnar. It will sticker for a little less than $40k, same as the Lotus.
The point I was making was that the M coupe was probably the single biggest performance bargain of the 90's, even without the super duper 3.2 liter motor. It kicked ***, and now they are putting a superior drivetrain into a very similar sized car.
M2= teh winnar. It will sticker for a little less than $40k, same as the Lotus.
Sure, the M2 might be a stellar performer, but if its appearance does not capture car buyers' hearts & emotion$, it won't do very well........Z4 anyone???
