STONE VS WATSON II - THE RECKONING (a.k.a - OKOKOKOK, Stahp, Emma Watson!)
07-10-2013, 09:36 PM
#121
07-10-2013, 10:53 PM
#123
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: S.F.BayArea
Posts: 2,695
Car Info: Whatever The Lot Provides ;)
-Man Law we use the basic rules, who gets kicked out for eating crackers in bed? Well, Watson's from England, so therefore crumpets, biscuits, and thusly we infer crackers. Win goes to Stone.
-Theoretical/Religious logic we use the whole SuperBeing Logic. Nobody can prove or disprove right down to the Flying Spaghetti Monster, therefore we can theorize that we cannot also disprove Zombies.
Thus, again, the Win goes to Stone.
Last edited by TheFozz; 07-10-2013 at 10:55 PM.
07-11-2013, 12:48 AM
#127
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: N38.6775* W120.0805*
Posts: 3,548
Car Info: psm.03.wrx.wgn
07-11-2013, 05:06 PM
#129
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 7,441
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Nope, try again. See, I thought this bit out, we apply either Man Law or Theoretical/Religious Logic.
-Man Law we use the basic rules, who gets kicked out for eating crackers in bed? Well, Watson's from England, so therefore crumpets, biscuits, and thusly we infer crackers. Win goes to Stone.
-Theoretical/Religious logic we use the whole SuperBeing Logic. Nobody can prove or disprove right down to the Flying Spaghetti Monster, therefore we can theorize that we cannot also disprove Zombies.
Thus, again, the Win goes to Stone.
-Man Law we use the basic rules, who gets kicked out for eating crackers in bed? Well, Watson's from England, so therefore crumpets, biscuits, and thusly we infer crackers. Win goes to Stone.
-Theoretical/Religious logic we use the whole SuperBeing Logic. Nobody can prove or disprove right down to the Flying Spaghetti Monster, therefore we can theorize that we cannot also disprove Zombies.
Thus, again, the Win goes to Stone.
