225/50/16 vs 205/55/16
#1
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (52)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 6,912
Car Info: Evo X
225/50/16 vs 205/55/16
So I am looking for new tires. Something cheap, okay performance, all season good tread life. So I narrowed down to the following using tirerack decision guide.
continental conti extreme contact
bfgoodrich g-force t/a kdws
yokohama avid v4s
dunlop sp sport a2
When I call up big-o-tires in Santa Cruz. They guy was asking me why I want to go with 225 and not the stock size. He said it'll make it worst in handling. I was just thinking to have a bigger foot print better cornering. But since he is the 'tire guy' he must have a good reason for it. But I am at work, so didn't want to stay on the phone for too long and ask
What do you guys think? Thanks in advance.
continental conti extreme contact
bfgoodrich g-force t/a kdws
yokohama avid v4s
dunlop sp sport a2
When I call up big-o-tires in Santa Cruz. They guy was asking me why I want to go with 225 and not the stock size. He said it'll make it worst in handling. I was just thinking to have a bigger foot print better cornering. But since he is the 'tire guy' he must have a good reason for it. But I am at work, so didn't want to stay on the phone for too long and ask
What do you guys think? Thanks in advance.
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oakland, CA, Bay Area
Posts: 184
Car Info: Subaru WRX MY02
You know I was asking the same thing a while ago on this board. Its posted here somewhere....
Anyways, 225/50/16 widens the tire making it wider (not much), but making the sidewall smaller. and making it an idea "upgrade" from the stock 205/55/16 for the wrx.
Since there is more tire pressed up against the ground, it "should" grip the road more. Like you said footprint more for bettering cornering.
At least, this is what I was lead to believe....
Only downside was that I heard the tire "donuts" or "bulges" a little bit more.
Before you believe me, someone confirm what Im saying is true before I give bad info! Last thing I want to is to mislead someone
Anyways, 225/50/16 widens the tire making it wider (not much), but making the sidewall smaller. and making it an idea "upgrade" from the stock 205/55/16 for the wrx.
Since there is more tire pressed up against the ground, it "should" grip the road more. Like you said footprint more for bettering cornering.
At least, this is what I was lead to believe....
Only downside was that I heard the tire "donuts" or "bulges" a little bit more.
Before you believe me, someone confirm what Im saying is true before I give bad info! Last thing I want to is to mislead someone
#3
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 9,016
Car Info: 2009 wrx & 2000 4runner
Originally posted by useful
Anyways, 225/50/16 widens the tire making it wider (not much), but making the sidewall smaller. and making it an idea "upgrade" from the stock 205/55/16 for the wrx.
Anyways, 225/50/16 widens the tire making it wider (not much), but making the sidewall smaller. and making it an idea "upgrade" from the stock 205/55/16 for the wrx.
going 225 will increase your handling. larger contact patch means more tire to grip the road
the tires that you posted vary quite a bit for performance. do you have a second set for auto-xing and stuff?
i have the dunlop sp a2s on my stock wheels that i use for winter and off-roading. i like them a lot, sooooo much better than the re-92s were. a lot better in the snow and do pretty well off road. i used them in a couple rally-x's and did quite well with them.
dry road grip with the dunlop a2s isn't much different from the re-92s, so you won't be getting too much benefit from that aspect
the a2s however do have a tredware rating of 440 compared to the 160 of the re-92s so they will last a lot longer.
#4
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (52)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 6,912
Car Info: Evo X
Yeah, I do have a second set of tires for autox (Falken Azenis). The first two on the list are Ultra-High Performance All-Season and the last two are High Performance All Season. When I look at tirerack comparison it doesn't look so bad for the continental. I am just wondering why that guy would say 225 is would make it worst than 205.
Originally posted by wrx ish
the tires that you posted vary quite a bit for performance. do you have a second set for auto-xing and stuff?
the a2s however do have a tredware rating of 440 compared to the 160 of the re-92s so they will last a lot longer.
the tires that you posted vary quite a bit for performance. do you have a second set for auto-xing and stuff?
the a2s however do have a tredware rating of 440 compared to the 160 of the re-92s so they will last a lot longer.
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Warsaw, Indiana
Posts: 681
Car Info: 02 WRX Wagon White
Check the "Tire Info..." link on the top of the posts page. Tire sizing is confusing. The reason they have the same sidewall height (i.e. same outer diameter) is because 50% of 225 is essentially the same as 55% of 205. If that doesn't make sense - read that sticky post!
On the bulge - a wider tire on the same wheel hangs over the side of the wheel a bit more. The difference in total width is 20mm - less than an inch. Split that between right and left side and you get about 1/2 inch more "hangover" on either side of the wheel than you got out of the original 205 width tires. A good thing in my opinion.
On the bulge - a wider tire on the same wheel hangs over the side of the wheel a bit more. The difference in total width is 20mm - less than an inch. Split that between right and left side and you get about 1/2 inch more "hangover" on either side of the wheel than you got out of the original 205 width tires. A good thing in my opinion.
#7
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (52)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 6,912
Car Info: Evo X
Originally posted by Dexter@tirerack
On the bulge - a wider tire on the same wheel hangs over the side of the wheel a bit more. The difference in total width is 20mm - less than an inch. Split that between right and left side and you get about 1/2 inch more "hangover" on either side of the wheel than you got out of the original 205 width tires. A good thing in my opinion.
On the bulge - a wider tire on the same wheel hangs over the side of the wheel a bit more. The difference in total width is 20mm - less than an inch. Split that between right and left side and you get about 1/2 inch more "hangover" on either side of the wheel than you got out of the original 205 width tires. A good thing in my opinion.
#8
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 9,016
Car Info: 2009 wrx & 2000 4runner
Originally posted by iBlueVirus
Thanks! So can there be ANY bad things at all by going with 225 instead of 205?
Thanks! So can there be ANY bad things at all by going with 225 instead of 205?
camber angle plays a larger affect on the tire. the same camber between two tires of different widths, the wider one will wear faster on the inside (assuming negative camber)
#9
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 18,369
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally posted by iBlueVirus
Thanks! So can there be ANY bad things at all by going with 225 instead of 205?
Thanks! So can there be ANY bad things at all by going with 225 instead of 205?
#10
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Trying to figure out something creative to put her
Posts: 1,348
Car Info: 2005 CGM WRX Wagon
I am also looking to get new tires, and I have been looking at the same tires, but never thought to go with a wider tire.
So, from what I'm getting out of this, going with 225's rather than 205's will yield:
handling benefits
slightly better braking performance
slightly worse fuel economy
It sounds like the pro's outweigh the con's to me.
So, from what I'm getting out of this, going with 225's rather than 205's will yield:
handling benefits
slightly better braking performance
slightly worse fuel economy
It sounds like the pro's outweigh the con's to me.
#11
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 18,369
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Well, the wider tires also cost a little more, weigh a little more, and in the case of S03s, the difference in actual contact patch size isn't as much as it should be (not 20mm wider). If you are still on your stock wheels, I would stay with 205s for now. You'll still notice a huge difference just by upgrading the rubber. If you have 7 or 7.5" wheels, then go ahead and go with 225 if you wish.
#15
???
Originally posted by Dexter@tirerack
On the bulge - a wider tire on the same wheel hangs over the side of the wheel a bit more. The difference in total width is 20mm - less than an inch. Split that between right and left side and you get about 1/2 inch more "hangover" on either side of the wheel than you got out of the original 205 width tires. A good thing in my opinion.
On the bulge - a wider tire on the same wheel hangs over the side of the wheel a bit more. The difference in total width is 20mm - less than an inch. Split that between right and left side and you get about 1/2 inch more "hangover" on either side of the wheel than you got out of the original 205 width tires. A good thing in my opinion.
I realize that there is an acceptable range of wheel widths for a given tire width. But doesnt' the bulge (or wheel pinch) compromise the performance of the sidewall?
Bulge = extra play in the sidewall. NO?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theo79
Suspension, Handling, and Brakes
1
12-04-2007 10:05 AM
useful
Wheel & Tire
38
05-03-2005 01:12 AM