Is ATT internet as fast as Comcast?
Is ATT internet as fast as Comcast?
02-23-2010, 04:07 PM
#3
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sac
Posts: 9,923
Car Info: your mother crazy
NO. even uverse (factional fiber) sucks. loads of packet loss, crappy support, the TV is the only service from ATT i can recommend.
Currently at home im using comcast for internet/phone and ATT for tv (speed HD).
Currently at home im using comcast for internet/phone and ATT for tv (speed HD).
02-23-2010, 04:18 PM
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 363
Car Info: 1975 Ford Pinto
yea just like everybody said. I use to have att dsl, compared to comcast, they are in the range of suck. even more so when you see the price on the service
I believe att's "elite" is $35 a month, and its 6MBps? with snail speeds on the upload. i think i was getting like 60kb/sec upload max.
comcast i pay $19 a month and I can download ~1.5MB/sec! and my upload speed is as fast as att elite DOWNLOAD speed.. which is like 300Kb/sec
I believe Uverse can provide speeds matching that of what most comcast owners have, but definitely no where close to the same cost.
Only downside with comcast is the download cap, I was afraid of that, but after almost a year, I had never had a problem of going over and I use a good amount of bandwith.
I believe att's "elite" is $35 a month, and its 6MBps? with snail speeds on the upload. i think i was getting like 60kb/sec upload max.
comcast i pay $19 a month and I can download ~1.5MB/sec! and my upload speed is as fast as att elite DOWNLOAD speed.. which is like 300Kb/sec
I believe Uverse can provide speeds matching that of what most comcast owners have, but definitely no where close to the same cost.
Only downside with comcast is the download cap, I was afraid of that, but after almost a year, I had never had a problem of going over and I use a good amount of bandwith.
02-23-2010, 04:48 PM
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 925+415
Posts: 1,347
Car Info: 05 CGM STi to be converted to RS
02-23-2010, 05:17 PM
#12
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Campbell
Posts: 1,475
Car Info: AW Pig-STI
yea just like everybody said. I use to have att dsl, compared to comcast, they are in the range of suck. even more so when you see the price on the service
I believe att's "elite" is $35 a month, and its 6MBps? with snail speeds on the upload. i think i was getting like 60kb/sec upload max.
comcast i pay $19 a month and I can download ~1.5MB/sec! and my upload speed is as fast as att elite DOWNLOAD speed.. which is like 300Kb/sec
I believe Uverse can provide speeds matching that of what most comcast owners have, but definitely no where close to the same cost.
Only downside with comcast is the download cap, I was afraid of that, but after almost a year, I had never had a problem of going over and I use a good amount of bandwith.
I believe att's "elite" is $35 a month, and its 6MBps? with snail speeds on the upload. i think i was getting like 60kb/sec upload max.
comcast i pay $19 a month and I can download ~1.5MB/sec! and my upload speed is as fast as att elite DOWNLOAD speed.. which is like 300Kb/sec
I believe Uverse can provide speeds matching that of what most comcast owners have, but definitely no where close to the same cost.
Only downside with comcast is the download cap, I was afraid of that, but after almost a year, I had never had a problem of going over and I use a good amount of bandwith.
02-23-2010, 05:19 PM
#13
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 369
Car Info: 02 WRX sedan
1) ATT can mean different things. They do DSL and cable (U-verse)
2) Fast can mean different things. Latency is not throughput. Disconnects suck. Etc...
My experience with Comcast is that they are:
- throughput: fast
- latency: meh
- reliability (disconnects, etc...): not very good.
IMO the latter two are far more important than overall throughput unless all you do is download torrents and ****. Wait, this is i-club, so most people here that is what they do, so... uhhh, Comcast might be good for you.
I had 768 kbps DSL for YEARS before switching to Comcast and I found I had a LOT more frustration switching to Comcast and watching the DSL modem lights flash waiting for it to re-train after a disconnect than I ever did waiting for my "slow" 768kbps downloads vs. my current "fast" 3 or 6Mbps or whatever package I'm on downloads.
Note: My DSL was not directly through AT&T, it was through Speakeasy using AT&T lines.
Last edited by Concillian; 02-23-2010 at 05:21 PM.
agreed... but comcast sucks *****. I guess we are looking for which one sucks less?
02-23-2010, 09:12 PM
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 1,610
Car Info: 4日本車
Seriously, why would you want ATT, or FIOS, when you could have............................THIS
(BTW, it's 9pm PST, and if it's closer to midnight or later I normally peak around 64Mbps Down, and 18Mbps Up)
(BTW, it's 9pm PST, and if it's closer to midnight or later I normally peak around 64Mbps Down, and 18Mbps Up)
