FUNKED1
11-07-2004, 02:20 PM
lols (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/11/07/wus207.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/11/07/ixnewstop.html)
|
View Full Version : pwn3d FUNKED1 11-07-2004, 02:20 PM lols (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/11/07/wus207.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/11/07/ixnewstop.html) constellation 11-07-2004, 05:10 PM its actually pretty sad that homeboy is going to be run out of his own town for speaking his mind. I don't know if its as funny as it is scary. Unregistered 11-07-2004, 05:48 PM Yeah gosh darn it that damn pinko liberal bastard, he actually spoke up for what he believed in. Lets run his ass out of here since he don't believe like us! Gosh darn it! We won't take this anymore! :rolleyes: MonkeyAB 11-07-2004, 05:57 PM yes, very sad. It seems Freedom of Speech is no longer honored in Crawford. You think perhaps the president might speak out against this type of behavior? FUNKED1 11-07-2004, 06:02 PM It's actually a perfect example of free speech. He got to say his piece, and his readers get to say theirs. HellaDumb 11-07-2004, 08:20 PM It's actually a perfect example of free speech. He got to say his piece, and his readers get to say theirs. Exactly. Unregistered 11-07-2004, 08:32 PM "On their home turf, however, Mr Smith's reporters have been harassed and threatened near the Crawford Coffee Station, where President Bush occasionally pops in for fried onion rings." Yep perfect example of "free speech". FUNKED1 11-07-2004, 08:39 PM Harrassed - free speech Threatened - still free speech, but pretty lame. But people telling him their opinion on his paper, or writing him letters to express their opinions, or choosing not to advertise in his paper, or cancelling subscriptions, there's nothing wrong with that. They are exercising their rights just as he exercised his. He's free to print his paper. They are free to not read or subsidize it if they dislike him or his writing. Unregistered 11-08-2004, 01:50 AM Yes they are free to do all those but threatening a individual for what he writes is not a perfect example of free speech at all. All they had to do to voice there oppinion was not buy the paper. They obviously did not. Hence harrassing the guy and threatening him. Which is not something to "lol" about. FUNKED1 11-08-2004, 07:59 AM Read it again. One of his reporters was allegedly threatened. And the lol was at the tards getting all upset about the paper as much as the tard who wrote it. |