Aftermarket Forced Induction - Turboed factory NA engines Turbo EJ25! Who said that all Subarus are created equal? Aftermarket turbochargers on factory normally-aspirated engines (factory turbo engines have their own forums).

AVO kit vs. LudeSpeed Stage III

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2003 | 12:56 PM
  #2  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
They are both good, but I would agree with your statement that the Ludespeed seems more complete. It would be my choice. Also, Tom is usually availabel for post-sale help. He's gotten a lot of compliments for his service.
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 01:00 PM
  #3  
BongMan's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 881
From: Fremont
Car Info: '01 RS BRP
Thumbs up

After seeing both kits in person, and installed, I would say the ludespeed is better for performance.

However the AVO kit is much easier to install.

However, if you kiss then I'd go AVO. As the Ludespeed stuff requires you to learn how to tune. Or you can just ask someone.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 06:50 PM
  #5  
KillerTHC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5
Originally posted by maharashii
I thought the Safeguard on the ludespeed kit meant you didn't have to know how to tune
the new stage iii ludespeeds come with Link Plus ECUs and not the J&S Safegaurd.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 07:20 PM
  #6  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally posted by KillerTHC
the new stage iii ludespeeds come with Link Plus ECUs and not the J&S Safegaurd.
The Link performs the same function as the J&S. That is why Tom doesn't include it in the Stage III kit, but does in the stage II.

Originally posted by maharashii
I thought the Safeguard on the ludespeed kit meant you didn't have to know how to tune
Well, it means it's harder to blow up your motor, but it could still be done. Also, it has nothing to do with tuning for best drivability and max power. It's just a hedge against severe knock holing a piston or burning a valve before you were done.
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 06:19 PM
  #8  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Nope. It uses piggy-back boxes rather than real engine management.
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 02:56 PM
  #11  
svxr8dr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 559
From: The Couve in Washington State
Car Info: 02 BRP 2.5RS-T
I would like to add that the AVO kit uses LINK as well, talk to Sean at www.rallitek.com

MY kit is getting installed as I write this
Old Sep 7, 2003 | 08:48 PM
  #15  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Has your rebuilt unit caused any problems?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:08 PM.